Information Design: Final Project
01/02/2026 - 23/03/2026 (Week 1 - Week 8)
WANG JINYI / 0374697
DST60504 / Information Design / Bachelor of Design (Honours) in Creative Media / Taylor's University
Information Design: Final Project
TABLE OF CONTENT
INSTRUCTION
FINAL PROJECT
FEEDBACK
Mr. Kannan mentioned that we have already done quite a lot in this project. The opening works well, even without heavy text transition effects, and the way we matched the visuals with the music creates a strong mood. It gives a slight 90s retro cutting style, which is quite interesting.
However, there are still some issues in terms of frame-level details. During the process, we might not have paid enough attention to these small details. One suggestion is to avoid grouping elements to move together all the time. Instead, each element should have its own movement. This helps improve the sense of motion and makes the animation feel more natural.
He also suggested adding motion blur to moving elements. This can reduce the “PPT-like” feeling where objects only scale and move in a very rigid way. Basically we need to study more about animation principles, especially how motion behaves in a more realistic and natural way.
Another point is about the cooking process. Before and after mixing the ingredients, there is not much visible difference. We should make the transformation more obvious, so the audience can clearly see the change. This is important for an instructional animation, where each step should show clear progression. For the stopwatch element, he mentioned that we can try using parenting. But if it looks strange or unnatural, it is safer to keep it static instead of forcing the effect.
Overall, the main improvement needed is to focus more on motion details, such as inertia and natural movement. If these details are refined, the overall quality of the animation can be improved significantly.
REFLECTION
Basically this project made me realize that doing an instructional animation is quite different from designing a static infographic. When it was still a poster, everything was shown at once, but when turning it into animation, we had to think about timing, sequence, and how the audience follows each step. At first, some parts of our animation were too fast, so the information was not very clear. So we went back and adjusted the timing, and added small pauses between steps, which eventually made the flow easier to follow.
Another challenge was working as a team. Since we split the work into two halves, our animation styles were slightly different at first. For example, the timing and movement did not always match, which affected the overall consistency. Then, during the final stage, I took time to adjust both parts together. I refined the timing, fixed some awkward transitions, and tried to unify the motion style. This helped improve the visual hierarchy and made the whole animation feel more cohesive. We also faced a technical issue when sharing files. When opening the project, some assets were missing, which caused everything to show up incorrectly. So we learned to use the “Collect Files” function in After Effects to properly package all the assets.
From a design perspective, I started to understand how motion can guide attention. Instead of just making things move, we had to think about hierarchy and clarity. For example, which element should appear first, which should be highlighted, and how timing can help the audience understand each step. The music also played an important role, because we tried to match the animation with the beat, which made the whole video feel more engaging.
Overall, I feel this project was quite rewarding. It was interesting to see my poster turn into a full animation. I also improved my skills in After Effects and became more familiar with the workflow from planning to final output. Working with a partner was sometimes challenging, but it also helped me learn how to communicate and solve problems better.













Comments
Post a Comment